umm mel made me draw pearl
i have applied ALL OF MY ART ACADEMY SKILLS HERE except i don’t know how to pick the colors myself and i’ve never actually used gimp with a tablet before so i’m still doing a lot of mashing buttons at random
basically...

umm mel made me draw pearl

i have applied ALL OF MY ART ACADEMY SKILLS HERE except i don’t know how to pick the colors myself and i’ve never actually used gimp with a tablet before so i’m still doing a lot of mashing buttons at random

basically color-dropped a screenshot for base colors, turns out pearl is literally white, who knew, mel probably did

wow that episode was basically solid gold all the way through dang

as was marble madness which i’d missed

tbh this show is way better and less stressful when i accidentally skip all the hellen jo episodes

Anonymous asked:

Judging by what one of the storyboard artists said "Here’s hoping’ Kevin was traumatized into reconsidering how he approaches women." I think that steven and connie unfusing in front of kevin WAS supposed to be his comeuppance.

man how is that a comeuppance.  he wasn’t humiliated; no one was paying attention to him.  he didn’t learn a lesson; no one is going to go “man what if this OTHER girl is ALSO two kids in disguise??”.  he looked mildly surprised and walked away.  that is a pretty great outcome for being annoying sleaze.

or maybe better put: how do you think kevin is going to act around the next pretty girl he sees?

orcaowl asked:

I haven't seen the epi yet, but I think shows can get away with girls liking girls more so because of how media/society actively ignores their existence more so than the fake lesbian crap made for straight men tbh. Even when girls are canonically together in media they are ignored and often just considered to be "good friends" or "gal pals" or something like that. I think because of that, SU can get away with more because they could always say "oh friendly blushing" and people would believe it.

as we all know, cis boys cannot blush.  biological impossibility.  the blush organ is located within the ovary

Anonymous asked:

Not once was stevonnie referred to as she or a girl

uhhh not once was there any indication that anyone thought the new person loaded up with stereotypically feminine attributes (long hair, small waist, wide hips, belly shirt, short shorts, female VA) was anything but a girl, either

it’s technically true that stevonnie could’ve been a non-girl, and that the entirety of beach city, including kevin, is so gender-sensitive that not a single one of them even had the thought that “this person is a girl”

but it also could’ve all been an illusion or a dream.  nothing in the episode says it wasn’t, right

it doesn’t make sense to design the character like that, introduce a clear Dickhole Straight Dude archetype antagonist, and not intend that at the very least other people assume the character is female

and even if you are 100% right my point STILL STANDS: it would have been more subversive in the real world if stevonnie had been loaded up with stereotypically masculine attributes and lars had still found them stammeringly attractive

Anonymous asked:

Wow, you and PK have once again taken something way too far (SU). It's fine to not like/hate an episode, but you are both so aggressive and rude when you confront someone and act so entitled that it's not even funny. The writers don't owe you anything. You're not paying them, they're not making episodes just for you. You don't realize you're crossing boundaries and stirring up negativity and people are getting sick of it. Stop terrorizing things/people who don't live up to your personal standard

Your smug, self-righteous, holier-than-thou attitude has made me so angry. I wasn’t gonna feel better until I let you know this, so here we are. By the way, it isn’t the rest of the fandom who has a problem. It isn’t the crew who has a problem. YOU have the problem. Your posts go beyond being negative. They’re toxic. They’re toxic to fans, and particularly artists. And your words have consequences.

you realize they…  are paid for this, right?  like, this is their job.  their job is to make steven universe.

also i would like to remind you that this is PK’s sole contribution to that entire reblog thread, and the only other notable thing she wrote was a long and heartfelt review of the episode, so i’m not sure why she keeps being lumped into this.

i wasn’t even aiming at the writer.  i was replying to PK, which is why i reblogged PK, and not the original ask.  i made one snippy reply because i felt insulted, then elaborated when someone else got mad.

i wrote it for my blog, in response to my partner, because of how i felt about something.

naturally this ended up on the writer’s dashboard anyway because tumblr is garbage and there’s really only the one way to thread responses.  but instead of doing something trivial like putting me on ignore (or just hitting refresh and letting the dozens of likes drown me out) he deleted the post, then made another, then deleted his blog, then locked his twitter, then i guess made some tweets and deleted those and i don’t know.

nothing i ever said was even directed to him.  if that’s still “harassing”, “bullying”, and now “terrorizing”, well, uh, my bad.  it certainly wasn’t my intention for him to vanish from the internet.  but if all it took was one grouchy fan who cares a lot about details, i’m frankly astounded that he was still here.

i’m actually rather dismayed that a penchant for detail is being devalued here — i’ve seen a screenshot of an ask someone sent him, saying that the people talking about “consistency” don’t care as much as they say they do.  well, yes, i do, tyvm.  that shouldn’t be a huge surprise or a bad thing for a show with a main character who exhibits traits of genuine OCD.

meanwhile the vitriol said of me (most of it not by name, granted, which is nice) has been far more mean-spirited than anything i said in the first place.  and has come largely from people who then congratulate themselves for being part of such an otherwise friendly and chill fandom.  weird, the things people say when they feel slighted.

emphasis that the show isn’t made just for me has been a somewhat common theme as well.  but it isn’t made just for you or anyone else, either, so why should anyone care when you like an episode?  it seems like the same reasoning applies.

i don’t feel entitled to anything here, btw.  but it looked like it had been trying to be an amazing series, and i’m deeply alarmed and worried to see the bar suddenly drop so low, twice in not so many weeks.

it’s certainly the staff’s prerogative to make whatever quality product they want.  but they have shown they’re willing to put amazing and brilliant effort into character development and motivation and continuity.  to go from that to last week’s episode was crushing.

fear not; i will channel my frustrations more constructively + coherently in the future.  but i can’t not be frustrated when things aren’t as good as i know they could be.

if it makes you feel any better, that means i’m basically always frustrated with everything.

there are like a dozen posts in the steven universe tag angry about “all” the ungrateful fans

but i think they’re all really just subtumbling me

it’s me, i did it, i ruined the fandom single-handedly, with like two paragraphs

watch out i’m gonna catch up doctor who soon and then i might ruin that fandom too 👻

STEVEN IS THE ONLY FRIEND CONNIE HAS EVER HAD IN HER ENTIRE LIFE

AND HER PARENTS ARE TREATING HER LIKE THIS

TO NO CONSEQUENCE

IN FACT PARENTAL MEDDLING — KEEPING CONNIE AND STEVEN APART, NO LESS — IS THE FINAL PUNCHLINE OF THE EPISODE

WHAT THE FUCK

ok im done gn

what really most exemplifies fusion cuisine as sitcom writing is this:

steven is grounded from tv for a thousand years. this happens right at the end of the episode, so it’s never undone.

do you think there’s any chance this will ever be mentioned again?

or do you think it’ll be quietly ignored, and we’ll be back to the status quo by next episode, with steven watching some new tv parody?

because the latter is the hallmark of the sitcom.

purplekecleon:

So, Fusion Cuisine. I tried writing a post about this for a couple of hours, but Firefox crashed and Tumblr sucks, so it didn’t save it.

Let’s try take two.

Note: I am only writing this at all, and only devoting another one or two hours of my time to writing this at all, because I fucking love Steven Universe. If you don’t believe me, search my “Steven Universe” tag for all the fanart I draw in my spare time. I was blessed to be able to actually contribute a comic cover to it, which I think will be out “soon”ish. I love it. This is the only fanart I even make anymore. It’s absolute favorite show. The disappointment that was Fusion Cuisine left a bad taste in my mouth, especially after last week’s amazing Ronaldo episode. I didn’t think we’d get an episode that was worse than House Guest, but here we are, so I’d like to explain it in one spot so I don’t have to keep repeating myself.

To sum it up:

Pros

-Garnet’s entire phone call exchange. Hilarious, one of her best moments.

-Alexandrite’s amazing design, from her strange “eye” markings to the hidden second mouth that’s reminiscent of Sugilite’s mouth… it’s fantastic.

-Amethyst telling Steven he could’ve ended up in prison

Cons

-Literally everything else

Below the read-more for a lengthy explanation on why I feel these things. Hopefully you can understand where I’m coming from, even if you don’t agree with every single point.

—-

Read More

What gets to me the most is that virtually none of the characters’ actions or reactions make any sense unless you assume all of them are idiots. None of them acted like any of us would act — or like they’ve acted in the past.

Really, if you want to get why I’m bothered: rewatch the episode, pause after every line, and ask yourself “what would I do now? what would this character do now? why would I do that?”. Then unpause and witness a complete non sequitur, almost every time.

I might as well throw in a few other things that came to mind that got lost in your computer woes:

  • Remember the phone call between Connie and Steven. Connie says she can’t come over again until her parents meet Steven’s parents. But she only says this as an explanation as to why she can’t come watch Under The Knife with Steven. Why wouldn’t she have told Steven this condition as soon as she heard about it?

  • For that matter, after thinking Steven’s mom just told them their child was dead, why wouldn’t Connie’s parents make any attempt to contact Steven’s parents? Or go to their house, which is two blocks away? Or anything? The “playing with swords” gag was hilarious, but seems to have had no bearing on how anyone acts throughout the rest of the episode.

  • Why does Steven so adamantly refer to the gems as his family now? In Together Breakfast, he repeatedly says “I thought we could eat together, like best buds” — a line that I always thought would sound more natural as “like a family”. It stuck with me so much that he sounded like he was avoiding the word. But here he used it multiple times, where I don’t think he ever has before.

  • Why does Alexandrite hate doctors? That doesn’t seem like something any of the gems would say, so why does their fusion?

  • Why are the gems so angry that Steven spent about twenty seconds running away? Garnet admonishes him for risking getting hurt in traffic — after all the critters Steven himself has defeated, Garnet doesn’t trust him to know how to cross the road?

  • Why would Garnet think losing dinner is an appropriate punishment, in an episode that stressed multiple times how humans need to eat?

  • Nitpickin, but: verb tenses get messed up twice, which jarred me a bit. On the phone, Connie says “if they found out I lied to them, they’ll …”. Also, after Alexandrite unfuses, Garnet admonishes Pearl and Amethyst with “we’re doing this for Steven”, which seems like a strange tense to use (and strange thing to say overall) after the plan has obviously failed catastrophically.

nomaspreguntas asked:

I thought that Pearl liked pie ('So Many Birthdays'). And yet, she can't stand the thought of eating ('Fusion Cuisine'). Why is this?

matt-burnett-deactivated2014111 answered:

Pearl likes the concept of pie.  She can appreciate the human practice of baking for the precision it often requires.  It’s really more of a science than a cooking method, in her eyes.  The process is what she’s into.  The actual consumption of the pie, of course, seems absurd.

Alternatively, if that retcon doesn’t work for you, Pearl just thought Steven was talking about pi.

lapisgemlazuli:

ok actually i am genuinely curious: what other inconsistencies/”tropey” things did you find in the latest episode other than pearl taking issue with eating??

and i do agree that consistency is important and listening to the audience is a must, but the fact that pearl enjoys baking for the scientific aspect of it is stated in the comics as well!!

as for the cookout with the pizzas, that may have been similar but it was still different enough for pearl to not complain. in this case she would be the only gem being forced to act as human as possible in front of connie’s parents. the cookout was intended to introduce everyone and have the pizzas get to know them as gems. there was no pressure to have any lying involved whatsoever in that situation, unlike in fusion cuisine

i highly doubt this is the product of lazy writing, like you seem to be implying here, and will not cause lazy writing in the future. if this truly was a mistake on the writers’ parts, then fine, my bad, it was one mistake. just one inconsistency isn’t going to destroy the entire show.

pk wrote a post, though there is plenty more she didn’t touch on as well

tl;dr: the whole episode felt like a series of one-liners based off of one-dimensional characters who only exist to say their stock jokes. nobody reacted to anyone else sensibly; the motivations were paper-thin; the whole premise of the episode contradicts everything we know about fusions. there are two entire new characters and the most development we get is “mom is a doctor”.

steven universe is usually very clever: it catches me off-guard, it’s full of sprinkles of insight into how the characters think, it refers back and forward to other events so i feel like there’s an actual persistent world here. this episode did none of those things. it turned the characters into clueless silhouettes of themselves so they would fit into someone’s plot idea — rather than letting the characters determine where the plot went.

nomaspreguntas asked:

I thought that Pearl liked pie ('So Many Birthdays'). And yet, she can't stand the thought of eating ('Fusion Cuisine'). Why is this?

matt-burnett-deactivated2014111 answered:

Pearl likes the concept of pie.  She can appreciate the human practice of baking for the precision it often requires.  It’s really more of a science than a cooking method, in her eyes.  The process is what she’s into.  The actual consumption of the pie, of course, seems absurd.

Alternatively, if that retcon doesn’t work for you, Pearl just thought Steven was talking about pi.

holopearl:

lexyeevee:

purplekecleon:

So what about the cookout with the pizza family? Where Pearl was around a whole event centered on cooking? And had no issue?

I would really like if there were some consistency enforced instead of explanations that have to be sought elsewhere outside of the cartoon. It is extremely immersion-breaking while watching it.

it’s almost like Fusion Cuisine was a poorly-written episode

watching this account try to resolve problems with bad episodes with even more hamfisted explanations that are outright called retcons is pretty sad, and aggravating

just say “oops, our bad” instead of fucking up the canon

Like can you guys fucking not? You’re being needlessly nitpicky— and quite frankly rude— toward an actual writer who is kind enough to even answer your questions in the first place. He’s answering with a sense of humor and a kind word rather than fighting douchebaggery with douchebaggery. Go outside. Hug a cat for goodness’ sake.

image

But that original reply isn’t a joke.  It’s cutesy, I guess, but reads to me as mostly dismissive.  Someone is jarred by a glaring inconsistency, and the response is “ha ha uhhh [some bullshit]” instead of, I don’t know, taking the audience seriously.  I find that to be a bit rude.

I’m griping because I like the show, and this was a disappointingly poor episode, and the closest to an official comment is to pretend that it wasn’t.

It wasn’t even just Pearl’s attitude towards eating; the two of us spent hours talking this out, and almost everything about the episode was inconsistent with established canon or just plain tropey.

So the problem I have is this: if everyone is willing to pretend this episode is just as good as all the others, what keeps the show actually as good as it (usually) is?

Also for your consideration, here are some cats.

image