Re: Advice!
hey guys! it was brought to my attention that they way i refer to my ‘sona’s gender identities is offensive to some people, and i sincerely apologize if i’ve made any of you upset with this! the last thing i want to do is to offend any of you or any of the supportive communities here. if i ever act in a way that concerns you in this matter - or any other matter - DO approach me about it so i can fix it.
i’m asking those who follow me, or those who are more knowledgeable about it, to please let me know what would be a more appropriate term for me to use to refer to my ‘sonas identities?
Yeah guys! Mise and I are asking for a little advice so if you have any info please let us know! Mise’s original post has an answer section, so please go there! :>
alas, there is no appropriate term
“hermaphrodite” is the only word for describing an individual with fully-functional genitalia of both reproductive sexes
i see this post has already gotten a suggestion to use “intersex”, and that troubles me
the whole reason “herm” got a bad rap in the first place is that people kept referring to porn as “herms”, and also to intersex people as “herms”, and then started thinking that’s what intersex was about
but hermaphroditism in humans is impossible; it’s really only something that occurs within a species as a whole, not individuals. (except in fantasy porn land of course.)
so now we coined “intersex” to make the difference more clear… and i’ve seen a good few people suggest using “intersex” to label herm porn with the intention that it’s a nicer word to use
but that recreates the exact same problem!
they are different words that mean different things. “intersex” is not a more polite synonym for “herm”. the whole reason “intersex” exists is to emphasize the difference from hermaphroditism.
i’m starting to wonder if the people who take issue with “herm” are intersex themselves, or are misunderstanding the situation
i can’t speak to whether intersex people tend to have a problem with “herm” used literally, but afaik it doesn’t have any synonyms — and definitely not “intersex”.
(anecdote: someone i know actually tagged herm porn as “intersex”, and someone sent him an ask complaining that intersex people don’t want drawn porn in their tag, and i had to explain to him that this person wasn’t just being a jerk)
Anonymous asked:Close. There were no reviews -- in fact, almost no one, anywhere, actually reviewed it. However the timeline is a little off. Grayson wrote about the game less than a week before the ex alleges he was sleeping with Quinn. And Quinn and Grayson are on video sharing a hotel room at GDC at least a week prior to said writing.
“turns out i’ve got nothing so i’ll just suggest her game sucks instead”
GDC was in march, the alleged affair was march/april, and grayson wrote about the game in january. the thing he wrote in march was about game jam, which only mentions depression quest insofar as it’s zoe quinn’s claim to fame.
so unless i’m missing something in the whopping two gaming news outlets he has worked for this year: you are completely wrong, try again
oh i see you already tried again
Even if the start of this was a little shaky (I’m fairly sure it wasn’t) it’s evolved into something much bigger. We’re not concerned with Quinn’s antics anymore, we haven’t been for a while. We’re mostly dealing with nepotism and corruption.
rofl “we’re not concerned with quinn’s antics any more” and then you open with quinn’s antics, jesus christ.
so, you’re “fairly sure”
you have a whole big clusterfuck of people here running around leveling accusations carefully designed to threaten whole careers
and you are “fairly sure”
it also turns out you are “completely fucking wrong”, just like almost everything i’ve been told is the root of this circus. just like every idiot who’s approached me on twitter to tell me i’m wrong, then mumbled “ummm do your research” when pressed for concrete detail
nepotism? corruption? like the accusation that zoe quinn doxed TFYC, which never happened? like the positive reviews for depression quest in exchange for sex, which don’t exist? like the condemning of leigh alexander for the crime of owning a side business? like the disparaging of jenn frank for writing an article supporting someone she knows?
that is an exact exhaustive list of the examples of “corruption” i have been given, and wow, hey, what an incredible coincidence: those people are all women.
giving you the benefit of the doubt that you’re not just a raging woman-hating misogynist, i’m sorry to have to tell you: you have been had by some raging woman-hating misogynists. they have framed their crap in terms of Our Tribe Is Under Siege Oh No and you have swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.
it’s basically the same tactic the republican party uses to keep racism alive: just use the word “welfare” instead, along with the traditional stereotypes of laziness and inferiority and worthlessness. people will practically turn it into us-vs-them for you. it’s like magic! if you’re lucky, they’ll even spice it up with some moral panic!
this isn’t about the generalization of gamers, or corruption in journalism, or whatever slimy excuse 4chan is puking out now. it’s about a bunch of maladjusted teenagers who have absolutely nothing going for them except that they know how to move a crosshair with a joystick, and they are fucking terrified that no one’s impressed by that any more. even girls can do it now! what happened! CORRUPTION
don’t get me wrong, there’s totally corruption in the game industry. but most of it lies with the publishers. strange, isn’t it, that this flash mob is going after the journalists instead of the people who have all the actual power and control? why do you think that is?
i have a guess: because doing a goddamn thing about the real sleaze in gaming would require not playing a popular game. and for a group of people whose very identity revolves around suckling the teat of big publishers, that is literally unthinkable.
tl;dr you and all of gamergate are completely full of shit
Anonymous asked:what is this quinnspiracy / gamergate thing i keep hearing about and what does it have to do with jontron? do you have an opinion on it?
oh christ
ok i think it goes something like this
a jilted ex posted a bunch of chat logs and a kinda spiteful-sounding story about how a female game developer, zoe quinn, had cheated on him with a few people in the game industry
reaction 1 was “omg what a dirty slut” because, y'know, gamers. but that turned out to not be popular rhetoric. this is the only place jontron is relevant: he retweeted a comic someone drew that starred zoe graphically in the middle of a gangbang. (probably because he was also in the comic, presented as the voice of reason. but wow.)
a couple of the accused people were writers for internet video game websites, so reaction 2 was a rallying cry for more ethics in game journalism. which on its own would be okay except
(a) the worst dirty laundry by far in game journalism imnsho is how review scores are kept artificially inflated effectively by extortion — if you give a game a bad review, the publisher can just not give you early access to its games any more. which is possibly why only 3% of games have a metascore under 33, versus 9% of movies. but that’s a problem with the publishers, really, and not something journalists can directly control.
(b) none of the journalists zoe had a relationship with gave her game a good review, as was a common refrain. as far as i can find, only one of them wrote about her game at all, and it was months before they were supposed to have hooked up. even the jilted ex confirmed this.
so reaction 2 was kind of complete hogwash as well.
reaction 3 was to devolve rapidly into conspiracy theories and general mudslinging like: zoe was in cahoots with a reddit mod (evidence being that he tweeted at her asking to DM), explaining why tons of posts were deleted from /r/gaming (which the mods claim was to remove personal information); that zoe had actively doxxed and destroyed a gaming charity (based on a reddit comment from someone involved with the charity) (but the charity now explicitly says zoe was not involved); or that zoe had faked being hacked and doxxed (????) because the posted phone number was from a place she’d never lived (my phone number is from pennsylvania where i’ve never lived, welcome to cell phones).
meanwhile, with spectacular timing, anita sarkeesian released another “women vs tropes in video games” video, which i guess showcases a bunch of examples of women as decoration or sex objects in video games, and everyone exploded anew.
faced with all this, basically everyone with a voice shook their heads and tut-tutted at gamers for being big whiny woman-hating baby manchildren. and then there came some murmurings that it might be time to hang up the “gamer” label altogether, because it’s become toxic and insular, and who never plays any games whatsoever?
which brings us, i think, to #gamergate. i’m not actually sure, because its origins and goals and contributors are all incomprehensible. i’ve been told two completely different things:
1. that #gamergate is about journalistic ethics, i.e. doubling down on reaction 2. i was talking to someone last night and asked for an example of “misconduct” he was tired of; he linked me to an article by leigh alexander, one of the people suggesting “gamer” is obsolete. apparently the problem is that she’s a journalist but also runs a consulting firm for game developers, but has never disclosed this “potential conflict of interest” in her articles. i think that’s fucking ludicrous, because if she’s not writing about her clients, there’s not even potential for conflict of interest, right? also, surprise, she’s a woman.
2. that #gamergate is about we’re not gonna take this disrespect of gamers any more. some feathers got ruffled by the fact that the people with an audience in the gaming community are making fun of the people who think they are the gaming community. (this is one of those awkward problems where, well, whose responsibility is it to ostracize toxic members of a group? if anyone’s?) my response to those people is that maybe they should try playing a game online with strangers for two minutes. i tried getting back into tf2 recently and very clearly recall joining a server just in time to hear an exchange of rape jokes. riot has had to pour untold manhours and UI tricks into tricking its players into not being complete assholes. and xbox live is basically infamous. navigating a minefield full of this kind of sludge is not really what i consider a good relaxing time, which is why i basically never play worldwide multiplayer anything. (but thank god for mario kart.) anyway given the long-running reputation self-labeled “gamers” have for being xenophobic and generally hostile to anyone who’s not a straight dude who loves FPSes, being taken aback when journalists point this out is kind of bewildering to me.
the one thing they do seem to agree on is that this isn’t about hating women, except a few thing it is about fighting “SJWs” or something, i don’t know.
a curious observation: most of the people replying to #gamergate tweets (and believe me, if you use the hashtag, you will get replies) are using accounts with a handful of follows/followers, three digits of tweets, and basically nothing except #gamergate replies and retweets. so it’s a bunch of people who don’t even use twitter trying to do twitter activism over a thing they can’t decide the meaning of.
oh and naturally several of the accounts i looked at were also retweeting misogynistic garbage. because gamers.
anyway stay tuned for further developments as the core gamer demographic burrows itself ever deeper up its own collective asshole
move along if you don't care.
I’m probably gonna get a lot of flak. but I really don’t care. Jontron does not deserve the shit hes getting on twitter right now. people have the gall to claim getting harassed is so horrible and immoral and then turn around and call this man human filth. scum. make fun of him and treat him like…
hello yes i am here to deliver the flak
this is, like, really apologetic
the irony being that jontron is not
Jontron is an honest man. he can say things the wrong way sometimes. a lot of people do that. but ultimately you can see if he truly feels he is wrong by logical standards he will back down and apologize, any reasonable person would.
but he didn’t. or, at least, he didn’t feel he was wrong by logical standards. instead he went off about ‘censorship’, which i guess he has confused with 'compassion’, because someone asked him to not use a rude word.
me and my friends usually make jokes. I make black jokes in front of my black friends and they make white jokes about me and we both laugh because we’re friends. if they are ever offended I apologize.
maybe that’s because you’re friends and not, say, one person broadcasting to hundreds of thousands of other people.
you should probably not make cracks about oppressed groups unless you are really sure your entire audience will be in on it with you.
and again, jontron did not apologize. he doubled down. (and then drew a naked comic of a female game developer, as i understand it. what a charming young man.)
they prefer to attack small jokes and friends because they’re easier than paying attention to actual issues that have an effect on minorities.
maybe having public figures constantly crack small jokes does have an effect on people. maybe. let me ask them.
ok i just checked and it totally does
they have no forgiveness in their hearts and it makes me sick to watch them treat people who do like trash and hurt them like it’s okay to treat anyone like that for having an opinion.
forgiveness? he didn’t apologize. he has shown no remorse. he has given entire interviews about how right he thinks he is on this.
hurt them? what if his words hurt someone else? why is only the backlash invalid, but you excuse his original actions — even almost-implying that he apologized or regrets them, multiple times?
for having an opinion? calling someone “retarded” is hardly an opinion.
i know the whole point of your post is to try to offer perspective, so fyi: immediately after reading this post, i glanced at twitter to discover that apparently someone has made “some very scary threats” against anita sarkeesian and her family. that is what is going on in the game industry right now. threats of violence over an internet documentary about video games.
but what really gets to you is that some famous youtube douchebag can’t be a dick without having people call him a dick.
maybe we’d be better off if people got called on being dicks more often.
I accept trans women in my tech feminism.
This goes out to all my fellow cisgender people in tech, both men and women. If you don’t know what cisgender means, stick with me. Content warning over the usual things.
I’m subtweeting… subposting?… sumblring? a recent personal blog post of a man whose technical work I respect, who I perceive as feminist, and who has been a good Twitter buddy to me for a few years now. I can’t bring myself to bombard him from orbit with my disproportionate social media reach, so, no names, no direct quotes. (I apologize for not being more direct about it. This is rooted in my ongoing social anxiety.) His post lamented the ongoing gender disparity in tech, but then criticized transgender women for eating up resources that should be going to real women in tech, essentially reducing trans women to a cosplay fetish and just another way for selfish men to center narratives on themselves.
I remind you for context that transgender people routinely face domestic abuse, routinely face street violence, and routinely face being driven to suicide. Transgender people are vastly more likely to be murdered than the average person. This is especially true of trans women, and extra-especially true of trans women of color. Such details are not directly tracked by most governments, making citations up to scientific standards difficult to come by. Estimates of the projected lifespan of trans individuals range from about thirty-five to twenty-seven to as low as TWENTY-THREE.
My sister is twenty-five. Imagined gods of social justice, give her more borrowed time than that.
Being transgender is not a costume you can put on and take off at your convenience; it’s not a role you choose to play. Specific people may vary their gender identity over time, but this doesn’t make them trans and then not trans any more than my bisexuality (pansexuality, really) means I flip-flop from straight to lesbian every time I see a cute girl. I can’t speak as to the subjective experience of being trans, because I am in fact Cis As Heck no matter how many times verbal abusers tell me that I, and implicitly all trans women, are “lying” by claiming feminine identities in tech. However, I can say that transgender identity is acknowledged by medical science as a Real Thing, and that the recommended course of action for one’s mental well-being is to embrace it, not suppress it. Unfortunately, prejudice is so deeply ingrained in culture that many doctors and mental health care providers are wholly ignorant, or worse, actively ignore research into transgender issues in order to enforce their gender essentialism beliefs at the expense of the well-being of their patients. Hence, repeated signs may be missed through one’s childhood, adolescence, or even their entire lives, and a transgender person may never get the help and support they need.
Several people in my personal life – blood relatives, in-laws, classmates, friends – have embraced the transition process in recent years, both designated-male-at-birth and designated-female-at-birth individuals. I have seen the same pattern repeatedly: someone struggling with depression, entire years of their lives weighed down with intense emotional distress, and suddenly – they’re happy! They’re productive! They’re going at life again! They face incredible challenges of course – possibly losing the support of family or encountering workplace prejudice, experiencing resurgences of depression and anxiety, and as already mentioned, everyone who is openly trans has to worry about their personal safety in public. However I would say without hesitation that, from my perspective, pursuing their trans identities was absolutely the right thing to do for their own sake in every case.
It seems to be true that there are a lot of trans women, relatively speaking, in tech. I don’t know that it’s possible to even estimate the numbers or ratios. However, I suspect it’s completely untrue that they exist in such numbers as to push cis women out of the frame. Just like you can put six men and two women in a movie and people will report that they perceived it as roughly 50/50, you can put a few trans women with a bunch of cis women and people will remark that there sure are a lot of trans women simply because they exist in the plural. Unfortunately, such observations seem to come with a negative connotation – too many trans women – not enough “normal” women.
The blog post that prompted this one complained that trans women have in the past benefited from male privilege, and hence someone transitioning mid-career is effectively bootstrapping on said male privilege before “changing teams” to the historically oppressed group. Specific trans women I know have confided in me that their eyes were opened to how much male privilege they really had in the past. But since a mid-career transition is a sign of not having gotten the help and support they needed during adolescence (it’s not like gender dysphoria typically comes out of nowhere late in life), being upset with a trans woman for a lingering patina of male privilege is contrary to the cause of supporting gender equality and minorities in general. The concept of “Shared Girlhood” underlying womankind’s struggle is only partially true to begin with. Black girls have a different window on oppression than white girls. Gay girls have a different window on oppression than straight girls. Poor girls have a different window than rich girls. So on and so forth. Trans girls – by which I mean trans women during their assigned-male childhood – have a very different view from cis girls. They simultaneously experience male privilege and deeply internalized repression, reinforced by every facet of culture, demanding that they bury their feminine personality traits and “man up.” The experiences are wildly different, but the common core is that culture denigrates femininity as inferior to masculinity in most respects. A trans man will struggle with being assigned femininity he may scarcely even possess. A nonbinary person may be confronted by perfect strangers on the street angry about “mixed signals,” because these strangers feel an urgent need to know whether to put them in the masculine or feminine slot. So on and so forth.
I’m just one cis-woman-in-tech, but my stance on the subject is:
I accept trans women as women, who, like all women and DFAB non-women, from the most feminine to the most masculine, have experienced difficulties in life due to cultural bias against femininity;
I do not resent trans women for making use of resources set aside for women, joining women’s organizations, or occupying roles that place them as a prominent face of women-in-tech;
I welcome trans women and nonbinary/agender/genderqueer people in my safe spaces.
We’re all in this together – it is the responsibility of everyone to make the culture we have, the industry we have, a safer place for people who have experienced discrimination and prejudice of any sort.
Trying to enforce the separation of trans women from other women does not support any cause I believe in – especially if that enforcement is being proposed by a man, no matter how well-meaning or feminist.
I thank the community of Unstable Systems for reviewing this post and providing feedback from several perspectives.
Anonymous asked:Is there anything wrong with using "herm" when referring to yiff or "futanari" when referring to hentai? They both seem like very standard terms and I've never seen them used to degrade someone. Keep in mind, I'm not trying to defend derogatory slurs - if they're that - but I've only ever seen these words used as genres.
forbiddenflora answered:There are a good amount of people who find problem with those words, but I don’t really have much to say other than relaying how others feel about those re: animals even
i’ve still only ever seen “trap” used as a self-description by people camming
it is really bizarre to hear that words are leaking from obscurish indie porn and ending up used by assholes somewhere out in the world
i’m kind of annoyed that words can be wrecked this way, but what is there to do about it?
Estioarem is a classic gendeflake. Meaning that she beleives she is above gender. She demands to be called “gender neutral” pronouns only, and she attacks any and everyone who does not bow to her tyranny on the subject.
The fact of the matter is that there are two human genders. Anybody whom thinks they can flaunt tacked-on labels to appear all the more more special than others, purely for attention may I add, needs to be stopped. It’s a blatant slap in the face for anyone with true gender dysphoria.
…Soon all of tumblr seemed to be in on this, joining the bandwagon and attacking AceOfClubs. The result has been AceOfClubs forced to leave Tumblr sadly, removing all of their atwork with them. It will be sorely missed.
hang on
what was that last bit
The result has been AceOfClubs forced to leave Tumblr sadly, removing all of their atwork with them.
could you repeat that
The result has been AceOfClubs forced to leave Tumblr sadly, removing all of their atwork with them.
oh
AceOfClubs
their
well then
74hc595 asked:Will there be characters in Floraverse who are NonBinary?
kecrambles answered:There already has been one!
i’m writing another!
also someone who is extremely binary
why would u do that though u didn’t do anything wrong?? it’s people thinking everything is meant in a negative way as always and u shouldn’t cater to them because people will see u let them push u around until u cant utter a single wordIt’s not like I have any intention to take every case of offense at face value, because you’ll never please everyone/some people will always find something. If I feel the need to put my foot down, I will.
But at the same time, just because my actions were unintentional or done without awareness it doesn’t absolve me of responsibility once it’s brought up, yeah? Like, it’s how a person reacts at that point that actually matters [and I kinda’ fluffed it initially but I think we got there in the end?]
Like, it might seem insignificant to you, in which case, since it’s clearly important to other people, is there a good reason not to oblige? I certainly can’t think of one.
What those people are saying is “you shouldn’t use this word because someone in bum fuck nowhere uses it in a negative manner and so it’s automatically a slur everywhere” which is fucking ridiculous because never have I heard the word trap be used as a derogatory term towards femboys.
plus the person who complained obviously didn’t know what they were talking about since they first called your character a dickgirl, and then said trap was harmful to trans people?? Like to my knowledge being androgynous doesn’t automatically make u trans.
When someone’s making chickens out of feathers, yes. You shouldn’t water yourself down just because some asshole on the other side of the planet told you to. What they’re making you do is not thinking “oh that word is offensive i shouldn’t use it” but “oh i shouldn’t use this word because i might offend this one person who has their head so far up their ass they’re starting to choke”
Besides, just because someone says a word might be offensive doesn’t mean it is. I (and I’m probably not the only one) who has never thought of trap or genderbend or whatever the fuck as something offensive. Just because the words might have negative or derogatory roots when they first were used in fucking 1800 or whatever doesn’t mean they are today. People need to learn to not take things so fucking literally,
hi i’ve known multiple trans people who are bothered by “trap”
it doesn’t bother me, personally, but neither do most slurs, whether they apply to me or not. but i still don’t make a habit of using them freely around an unknown audience, because i’m dimly aware that there are people in the world besides me. wow. amazing.
there are trans people who are fine with “trap”, trans people who actively identify as “trap”, trans people who use “trap” to describe a body type they find appealing, and trans people for whom “trap” is a reminder that they are not infrequently murdered for their crime of “tricking” a straight man — a trope the word quite literally reinforces.
so sure, it depends on your audience. but maybe if your audience speaks up and asks you not to use a slur because it’s bothersome, it would be common fucking decency to respect that. maybe other people’s comfort can take priority over your use of one word.
and hey, maybe you’d prefer to keep using the word for whatever reason. that happens sometimes, and this is a fuzzy case. but when that happens maybe you could just leave it at “sorry i’d rather keep using it” instead of being a colossal jackass and tearing someone to shreds for daring to be offended by a slur against them.
Anonymous asked:it's not really misgendering when the gender the girl wants to be called doesn't even exist anyway lol. just saying.
well thank fucking god we have Anon, Arbiter of All Gender, here to fucking resolve that for us
how else would i have known which people are deserving of a modicum of fucking respect? you have shown me the fucking light
fuck you up the ass with a rake, with your fucking buddy-buddy “lol just saying” when you are talking to someone who answers to “they” or “e”
garblefart-deactivated20181217 asked:by the way "trap" is a kind of offensive word to use for girls with dicks..
pasteldaemon answered:I’m not? He’s not even a girl he just likes to dress up that way.
Like aside from not applying questionable fetish terms to actual people to begin with, I thought trap referred specifically to cis people who’re dressed up/disguised for whatever reason who is even running around applying it to girls with dicks?
this is kind of awkward since there are several groups of people who identify in different ways and who all use “trap” to refer to themselves
but the word originates from the idea that trans people actively try to fool unsuspecting straight people into having sex with them — an idea that almost certainly fuels a lot of trans mockery and violence
and that’s also awkward because there are not-entirely-straight people who fetishize that idea and use it as a weird compliment for other people who deliberately play the part (and are generally, afaict, not trans themselves?)
it’s a bizarre collision between a lot of people who all feel very differently about sex and gender. but unless you’re very sure of your audience and they’re tightly-scoped, probably best to avoid “trap”.
also the people replying to this with “HERE WE GO LOL” and “ugggh seriously??” are kind of dicks; maybe assume good faith and take a moment to care about what a marginalized group of people might find offensive
alluka
yooo kind of tired of all the misgendering on alluka’s page
i know she’s Just An Anime Character but it’s like 99% canon that she’s trans; her parents and killua (killua being the only sibling who gives a shit about her and calls her a girl and his sister) call her she/her, but the two asshole brothers both call her “he/him/brother”
and yet the stupid wiki page insists on going with male despite alluka’s clear female presentation and the fact that her closest sibling calls her a girl and his sister
and in the talk page for this article there’s a bunch of stupid transphobic nonsense, with some people who actually know what they’re talking about in between the sea of gross reasons to excuse/explain the misgendering
anyway it’s just frustrating to me because here is a character that the author has written to be transgender (pretty clearly, you can see by how the asshole siblings will misgender her but killua doesn’t) and yet there are still people who are confused about sex/gender etc on her fuckin page
i forgot how annoying this page was until i had to look up some references while drawing her
“For the purposes of consistency and convenience, in this article, Alluka shall be referred to as being male until there is any concrete evidence to the contrary in the manga.”
this is some fucking bullshit right here
somewherefarbeyondhere asked:Hey Eevee, you're really knowledgeable about sexual orientations/identities, feminism, and a lot of other things relating to human rights and equality. Is there anywhere specifically that you get your information/perspective on things, or is it mostly just out of your head? I'm trying to get more involved with a lot of these issues, but I really don't know where to start. Anything would be really helpful!
uhh just stuff i sorta pick up sorry :S there are a lot of people with interesting things to say floating around twitter and tumblr and elsewhere (but also a lot of people with not so interesting things to say so ymmv)
Anonymous asked:That being said, what if a group of men decided to reflect this blog and expose women just like ya'll are exposing men? How would it make you feel? Seeing you're own tits and words of intimacy just completely out there for the digital world to see? I'm often amused by women's logical reasoning, But of course any man with experience knows that women are not logical thinkers rather more emotional thinkers.
straightwhiteboystexting answered:Did you know that there are entire websites devoted to “revenge porn” in which men post the nude photos and videos of exes, not making any attempt to block out faces or personal information?
oh lord what a shithead anon
lol i love this: “women are not logical thinkers rather more emotional thinkers”
comes right after asking “how would it make you feel” and implying heavily that the speaker feels that same way right now and only sent this ask because of that feeling
how’s the logical reasoning working out for you there anon
zhorken replied to your post: Is futa/futanari an incorrect or offensive term as well? …
that could mean… basically any combination of sexual characteristics as long as one of them is a dick
that’s not inherently a problem or anything, but istm there are a great deal of people who would like to distinguish more finely for the purposes of porn perusal
idk what the right thing is here. any terms coined are doomed to end up fetishy; there’s just no need to use them outside of porn, and usually fantasy porn specifically