Anonymous
asked:
how do you propose scientists should talk about the specifics of the history and mechanics of human evolution if the words 'male' and 'female' has been usurped as referring to identity rather than physiological dimorphism, or is physiological dimorphism scrappable as it is rendered a social construction by the mere existence of intersex people or something
maybe we can introduce some kind of cue to indicate when people are talking about the history and mechanics of human evolution, which is like 0.000001% of the time
we can call it “context”