tskumoyuuma liked this
evrelai liked this
sexy-androgynous-satan liked this port-wind-sea liked this
belles--rose liked this
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnn-blog liked this
cstalli liked this
pokeguild liked this
90sdroid liked this
mono-rey liked this
ask-the-mystical-legendaries liked this
brynalyn liked this
luvaci liked this
bexrambles liked this
virtualmanectric liked this
5600ml liked this
seasidedoe liked this
bronzeh liked this
mallowninja liked this
- Show more notes
camikun:
“but i’m going to anyway”
and they are, of course, mistaken.
this is probably a semantic can of worms i shouldn’t have opened, but yes i am somewhat uncomfortable with labelling a person as abusive, or an abuser, when that person was trying in good faith to be the exact opposite.
again, in the context of pengo, you’re basically telling me here that i should avoid people with mental illness or past abuse like the plague — because if i can’t guess how they feel or what they need at any given time, even if they actively try to hide it from me, i am being abusive. is that really the message you want to send?
tricky fucking hated mel, and from her perspective was a clear negative influence on pengo as well. she’d heard about him for months. and now pengo was texting tricky at the convention instead of fucking talking to her. of course she didn’t want to hear about him. do you think she should’ve just let pengo upset her? is that your idea of not being abusive, to quietly accept emotional damage? because to me this sounds like kind of a fucked-up dynamic you’re asking for.
and are you seriously now calling her abusive for wanting to spend any time at all alone with her boyfriend?
this, this is your gold standard for fucking abuse and manipulation? to be upset when one’s boyfriend spends far more time ditching his responsibilities to hang out with some other girl? when that other girl promised to stay out of the way and give them some space in their extremely limited time together?
are you even reading what you’re saying?
the contortions you’re willing to employ to demonize mel are fucking abhorrent.
this was, again, referring to “the outlet sparked”
you sure are willing to make up lots of excuses for pengo, while you detach all context from anything i or mel say or do and then call us terrible for it
but i suppose you’re right, here: pengo was a victim of himself, and/or circumstance. glad we could clear that up.
MAYBE BECAUSE THEY WERE TRYING TO DO BUSINESS AND WERE SURROUNDED BY TENS OF THOUSANDS OF POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS, WHICH IS NOT THE BEST ENVIRONMENT FOR TALKING OUT RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS
MAYBE ALSO BECAUSE, AS MENTIONED ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS, PENGO WOULD OFTEN BECOME OBVIOUSLY UPSET WHEN MEL BROUGHT UP ANY PROBLEMS — AND HE HAD ALREADY BEEN DRIVING PEOPLE AWAY WITH HIS POOR MOOD
excellent news!
what part do you not “believe”? the pages upon pages of logs?
i still don’t know what’s left that would make anyone think mel was abusive here. but you’re done, so i guess i will never know.
pengo reblogged it to the audience he had just netted himself. and he did so after he agreed not to bring it up. by the way.